The nation’s former leader in residential mortgage default insurance is now a distant second. Who cares? Two types of people:
a) People with strong income potential and student debt
b) People who care about taxpayer risk
Many wonder whether the government will step in and force privates to match CMHC’s restrictive policies. We’ll bet that won’t happen for two reasons: (A) it would be short-sighted because of the portfolio risk mentioned above, and (B) it would strand deserving borrowers, leaving them no reasonable financing options given their favourable risk profiles.
The next year is going to be interesting because CMHC has a new CEO who may be unhappy that its market share chart looks like Niagara Falls. We expect the housing agency to fight and scrap for share through year-end.
That said, CMHC seems more focused on its social housing mandate than market share. So, it probably won’t overtake Sagen for a long, long time — unless it rolls out new products or backtracks on last year’s rule tightening.
That may not be out of the question after the housing balloon deflates. After all, there’s little actuarial justification for CMHC’s restrictive lending practices, according to critics, its competitors, CMHC’s own government-monitored stress tests, arrears data and so on.